home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
QRZ! Ham Radio 4
/
QRZ Ham Radio Callsign Database - Volume 4.iso
/
digests
/
tcp
/
940123.txt
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1994-11-13
|
4KB
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 94 04:30:01 PDT
From: Advanced Amateur Radio Networking Group <tcp-group@ucsd.edu>
Errors-To: TCP-Group-Errors@UCSD.Edu
Reply-To: TCP-Group@UCSD.Edu
Precedence: Bulk
Subject: TCP-Group Digest V94 #123
To: tcp-group-digest
TCP-Group Digest Sun, 19 Jun 94 Volume 94 : Issue 123
Today's Topics:
A request of the past
Standard Digital Radio Interface
Standard Digital Radio Interface Proposal
Send Replies or notes for publication to: <TCP-Group@UCSD.Edu>.
Subscription requests to <TCP-Group-REQUEST@UCSD.Edu>.
Problems you can't solve otherwise to brian@ucsd.edu.
Archives of past issues of the TCP-Group Digest are available
(by FTP only) from UCSD.Edu in directory "mailarchives".
We trust that readers are intelligent enough to realize that all text
herein consists of personal comments and does not represent the official
policies or positions of any party. Your mileage may vary. So there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 1994 16:49:15 -0500 (CDT)
From: Kurt Freiberger <kurt@cs.tamu.edu>
Subject: A request of the past
To: tcp-group@ucsd.edu (TCP-Group Mailing List)
Anybody know where I can snarf the NET for Z80 that the Karn-meister
did for CP/M? I'd like to look at it for an idea. I just happen to
have an Ampro Little board or two handy....
73/Kurt
--
# Kurt Freiberger, WB5BBW Dept. of Computer Science, TAMU #
# Internet: kurt@cs.tamu.edu | "Even MY hypocrisy has its limits." #
# AuralNet: 409/847-8607 | #
# AMPRNet: wb5bbw@wb5bbw.ampr.org | - "Doc" Holliday, Tombstone #
# Disclaimer: Not EVEN an official document of Texas A&M University #
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 1994 07:02:35 -0500 (CDT)
From: Gerald J Creager <gerry@cs.tamu.edu>
Subject: Standard Digital Radio Interface
To: tcp-group@UCSD.EDU
I've only been following this peripherally, but I'd suggest that someone
(else) look at the Dallas Semiconductor SIMM Styx. 8530-based (and a few
other proc's if I recall) there are devices for a number of protocols. There
are a few of us looking at recasting one as a very small kiss TNC.
73, gerry
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 1994 11:04:26 +0200 (BST)
From: A.Cox@swansea.ac.uk (Alan Cox)
Subject: Standard Digital Radio Interface Proposal
To: JRA1854@tntech.edu (Jeffrey Austen)
>
> We seem to have several thoughts mixed together in this thread. I find the
> idea of an ethernet interface or an IP TNC interesting, but both of these are
> quite different than what I am proposing.
>
> Here are my goals:
> - the principal audience is the end users and the operators of packet
> "infrastructure" (digipeaters, nodes, links, etc.)
> - should be compatible with all current modulation and coding schemes
> - should be compatible with most anticipated modulation and coding schemes
> - must be easy to use --- plug-n-play is the primary goal --- I and many
> others are tired of this radio-tnc interface hack that we've been using
> for way too long (not that it wasn't a good idea at the time; it's just
> long past the time to come up with something better)
> - must be simple enough to be built into future radios (e.g., the next
> generation of mobile radios and even some handhelds)
As a software person who runs a major TCP/IP node but has trouble wiring a DB9
this soulds like someone has finally understood why fast packet and stuff hasnt
caught on.
Alan
------------------------------
End of TCP-Group Digest V94 #123
******************************